Perceived justice in complaint handling

Complainants judge a resolution on three things: the outcome, the process, and how they were treated.

Where it applies

Two of the eight page areas.

How to use it

Four ways to use it, and one to avoid.

  • Match compensation to the size and type of loss.
  • Make returns and complaints fast, with few handoffs.
  • Build apology, explanation and ownership into every reply.
  • Pair any voucher with an apology and explanation, because a voucher alone is not enough.
  • Avoid: making a refund conditional on removing or changing a review.
What the research found

Perceived fairness links the response to satisfaction and loyalty. Mostly service-sector studies.

For long-run loyalty, how people were treated mattered slightly more than what they got.

Tax and colleagues found complainants judged the outcome, the process and how they were treated. Two meta-analyses supported a chain from fair handling to satisfaction to loyalty intentions. The outcome mattered most for satisfaction with the complaint itself, while treatment mattered slightly more for long-run satisfaction and loyalty. Mostly service-sector studies.

Key research

Four sources, each checked.

Last reviewed

Before you use it · UK law

Never make a refund conditional on removing or changing a review.

This is simply a pointer to check, not legal advice. Seek legal advice before you put this principle into action.