Perceived justice in complaint handling
Complainants judge a resolution on three things: the outcome, the process, and how they were treated.
Two of the eight page areas.
It also applies sitewide, on every page. See everything at work on Post-purchase pages
Four ways to use it, and one to avoid.
- Match compensation to the size and type of loss.
- Make returns and complaints fast, with few handoffs.
- Build apology, explanation and ownership into every reply.
- Pair any voucher with an apology and explanation, because a voucher alone is not enough.
- Avoid: making a refund conditional on removing or changing a review.
Perceived fairness links the response to satisfaction and loyalty. Mostly service-sector studies.
For long-run loyalty, how people were treated mattered slightly more than what they got.
Tax and colleagues found complainants judged the outcome, the process and how they were treated. Two meta-analyses supported a chain from fair handling to satisfaction to loyalty intentions. The outcome mattered most for satisfaction with the complaint itself, while treatment mattered slightly more for long-run satisfaction and loyalty. Mostly service-sector studies.
Four sources, each checked.
Last reviewed
Never make a refund conditional on removing or changing a review.
This is simply a pointer to check, not legal advice. Seek legal advice before you put this principle into action.